Tag Archives: Lyft

No Matter What Else Happens, Now Lyft Can Say It Beat Uber (Because of This 1 Thing)
March 28, 2019 6:00 am|Comments (0)

[unable to retrieve full-text content]They both wanted to be first. But only one of them could be.

Posted in: Cloud Computing|Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Lyft Redesigns Its App—and Strategy—for the Age of Sharing
June 7, 2018 6:09 pm|Comments (0)

Before Lyft was Lyft, it was a struggling California startup called Zimride. Cofounder and CEO Logan Green launched it in 2007 (the name was an ode to Zimbabwe’s carpooling culture), aiming to connect college kids who needed rides with those who had cars. John Zimmer, now Lyft’s president, signed on with the idea that putting more people into existing cars could help cities fight emissions and traffic, all at once.

In 2012, Zimride spawned Lyft, after Green and Co. decided to put the whole thing on an app, Uber style. At first, drivers were just fellow carpoolers, picking up incidental passengers as they went. (This was the era of the “first bump,” when drivers were less harried gig economy workers than potential friends.) Today, 30 percent of the ride-hailing company’s trips are shared by multiple passengers, at least in markets that offer the option. That’s a lot, but less than satisfying for a company with sharing in its DNA.

This week, Lyft comes full circle. It just unveiled an app redesign that tries, very hard, to convince users to grow up and share. To go with the revamp, which will be rolled out in all markets throughout the month, Lyft has a new goal: By 2020, it wants 50 percent of its trips to be shared.

Lyft’s new app design gives pricing and estimated trip times for all service options.


Lyft plans to promote sharing in a few ways. It’s renaming its Lyft Line service as “shared rides,” a moniker that’s both easier to understand and vaguer, so perhaps easier to experiment with. Lyft will also sometimes start asking shared ride customers to walk a block or so to the closest main drag, to cut down on inefficient detours. (Uber rolled out a similar option in February, called Express Pool.) Plus, the app will prompt any user with a very similar itinerary to another to take a shared ride at the beginning of her trip, in exchange for a price cut.

Lyft is also introducing a new transit integration, which lets users plan trips using public transportation, Google Maps style. The point here is to nab more passengers heading to or from major transit hubs, and become the go-to travel app for world that loves apps.

The company says it’s working to promote sharing because it likes being green and good for cities. More butts in empty seats might mean fewer cars on the road overall. (Lyft recently pledged to invest millions in making its service carbon neutral.) But—surprise!—sharing should be good for business. Lyft may be worth $ 11 billion, but it still loses money. If it can squeeze more fares out of one trip, that’s more profit—and a step toward profitability.

Sharing should also ease the concerns of city officials who increasingly worry that ride-hailing companies are behind (or at least contribute to) worsening traffic. The more cars circle for passengers and loop-de-loop around the block dropping off fares, the more crowded the roads and smoggy the air. If Lyft can take cars from the street by making trips more efficient, that’s better service for everyone. And perhaps less scrutiny from government types who could make its business hard to operate.

And sharing matters a lot in the coming age of autonomy. When the first robotaxis hit the streets, they need to be shared, to recoup the staggering costs of research and development. Lyft is invested in this future, too: It launched its own autonomous vehicle development center in Palo Alto last summer, and is collaborating on the tech with Ford, Waymo, and General Motors, among others.

‘Sharing,’ They’re Blaring

Lyft’s pulled some canny design tricks to convince users to take slightly longer rides with strangers. The new app puts the prices and estimated trip lengths for its various services on one screen. No more navigating through “Line,” “Lyft,” “Plus,” “Lux,” and “Car Seat” choices before seeing how much the dang ride will cost. The app will even “remember” what sort of trip you took last—an SUV devotee, are ye?—and prompt a trip on that service right from the get-go.

Once you enter your destination and your choice of service, there’s about a 10 percent chance Lyft will shift you to a new screen. If another user is heading in exactly your direction, Lyft will prompt you to take a detour-free shared ride for a multidollar fare cut. In beta tests, says design VP Katie Dill, this feature change alone has generated a 5 percent jump in shared rides.

This new strategy follows a few that did not pan out. Lyft Carpool, killed after five months of Bay Area testing in 2016, let regular Bay Area commuters earn up to $ 10 by picking up others heading in the same direction. Lyft Shuttle picked up rush hour riders at set locations for a fixed fare (and received widespread flak for being a lot like a bus). When this new app rolls out, Shuttle will be no more. “The good news is that we have 11 years of trials, from the early days of dressing up in costume, and going to people’s dorm rooms and asking them to carpool and many, many things in between,” says Zimmer. They were frog and beaver suits, FYI.

Lyft has never been short on whimsy (RIP, pink mustaches) or feel good vibes, especially when compared to Uber, which for years embraced a bad boy reputation. But Lyft is still a company seeking profit, just like all the others, and its future hinges on convincing everybody to get along—even in the backseat.

More Great WIRED Stories


Posted in: Cloud Computing|Tags: , , , ,
U.S. court revives challenge to Seattle's Uber, Lyft driver union law
May 11, 2018 6:02 pm|Comments (0)

(Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Friday revived a business group’s challenge to a Seattle law, the first of its kind, that would allow drivers for ride-hailing services such as Uber Technologies Inc UBER.UL and Lyft to unionise.

A driver displays Uber and Lyft ride sharing signs in his car windscreen in Santa Monica, California, U.S., May 23, 2016. This logo has been updated and is no longer in use. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the city did not have the power to regulate payment arrangements between companies like Uber and Lyft and their drivers.

The litigation is unfolding amid a national debate over whether workers in the “gig economy” are independent contractors, who typically cannot form unions, or employees.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which sued over the law last year and counts Uber and Lyft among its members, did not respond to a request for comment. Neither did a spokesman for the Seattle city attorney’s office.

Seattle’s law, passed in 2015, requires the city to select a union as the exclusive bargaining representative of the estimated 9,000 drivers in Seattle who work for Uber, Lyft and other services. The law was put on hold pending the outcome of the Chamber’s lawsuit.

The Chamber argued that by allowing drivers to bargain over their pay, which is based on fares received from passengers, the city would permit them to essentially fix prices in violation of federal antitrust law.

A federal judge in Seattle last year disagreed, saying the state of Washington had specifically authorized its cities to regulate the for-hire transportation industry.

But the 9th Circuit on Friday said state law allows the city to regulate rates that companies charge to passengers, but not the fees that drivers pay to companies like Uber or Lyft in exchange for ride referrals.

The court sent the case back to the judge in Seattle to reconsider the Chamber’s antitrust claim.

The city and supporters of the law, including labor unions, have said that allowing drivers to unionize would improve their working conditions, making ride-sharing services safer for passengers.

Lawyers for the city had told the 9th Circuit that in some cases, drivers were engaging in unsafe behavior such as driving on little or no sleep because they are not paid adequately.

Uber is appealing a state’s judge dismissal of a separate lawsuit the company filed challenging Seattle’s law. A third lawsuit by Uber drivers was dismissed last year.

The case is U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. City of Seattle, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 17-35640.

Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Phil Berlowitz


Posted in: Cloud Computing|Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Lyft raises another $500 million in additional round of funding
November 23, 2017 12:06 pm|Comments (0)

(Reuters) – Uber rival Lyft Inc is raising an additional $ 500 million in funding, according to a U.S. share authorization document filed in Delaware news website Axios said. (bit.ly/2BhebbU)

The additional funding round, led by Alphabet Inc’s CapitalG, is an extension of the $ 1 billion round announced in October.

Lyft spokesman Adrian Durbin, confirming the funding round, in an e-mailed statement said, “Increasing the potential for this round will allow us to further accelerate our commitment to serving passengers and drivers.”

In October Lyft had said that the previous round of funding boosted its valuation to $ 11 billion from $ 7.5 billion. The fresh funding would raise its valuation to $ 11.5 billion.

Reporting by Sangameswaran S in BengaluruEditing by Greg Mahlich

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.


Posted in: Cloud Computing|Tags: , , , , , , ,